Follow Barack Obama prior and during his tenure as the 44th President of the United States. Read about my personal observations along with every day facts as they happen. This blog will only submit factual information about the first black President, now in his 2nd term of office.
BARACK OBAMA MEMORIBILIA available right HERE at www.obamaitems.info

BARACK OBAMA IN THE WHITEHOUSE

Send E-mail to the Editor at: obamainthewhitehouse@mail.com
Click on the GOOGLE TRANSLATE BUTTON BELOW AND SELECT YOUR LANGUAGE

Search This Blog

Showing posts with label afghanistan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label afghanistan. Show all posts

Gates: Any new troops to Afghanistan wouldn't 'flow' til early 2010

Sunday, September 27, 2009

September 27, 2009
Posted: September 27th, 2009 09:19 AM ET

From

WASHINGTON (CNN) – The Afghanistan conflict has proven more difficult than anticipated, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said in echoing President Barack Obama’s deliberative approach on whether to send more troops. In an interview broadcast Sunday on CNN’s State of the Union, Gates said the focus on Iraq by the previous administration of President George W. Bush meant the operation in Afghanistan has been limited.
“The reality is, we were fighting a holding action,” Gates said of situation under Bush, whom he also served as defense secretary.
“We were very deeply engaged in Iraq,” Gates said, later adding: “We were too stretched to do more. And I think we did not have the kind of comprehensive strategy that … we have now.”
Setting an exit strategy for Afghanistan would be a mistake, but the United States also will closely monitor developments to ensure its strategy is achieving desired results, Gates said.
Obama is under increasing pressure from congressional Republicans who favor sending more troops, as desired by commanding Gen. Stanley McChrystal, while many of the president’s fellow Democrats are expressing resistance.
Gates said McChrystal “found a situation in Afghanistan that is more serious than … we had thought and that he had thought before going out there.”
Asked why the Obama administration has yet to decide on McChrystal’s assessment that more troops will be necessary to defeat insurgents and protect the local population, Gates said it would take more time to properly analyze the situation.
"I think we are in the middle of a review," Gates told CNN Chief National Correspondent John King, adding : “Once we're confident we have the strategy right, then — then we'll address the question of additional resources.”
Gates also noted that any additional combat troops for Afghanistan "really probably could not begin to flow" until January 2010.
He disagreed with setting a clear exit strategy for Afghanistan.

"[T]he notion of — of timelines and exit strategies and so on, frankly, I think would all be a — a strategic mistake," Gates said. "The reality is — failure in Afghanistan would be a huge setback for the United States.
“[The] Taliban and Al Qaeda, as far as they're concerned, defeated one superpower, [the Soviet Union],” he continued. “For them to be seen to defeat a second, I think, would have catastrophic consequences in terms of energizing the extremist movement, Al Qaeda recruitment, operations, fundraising, and so on. I think it would be a huge setback for the United States.”
Gates said the process should be defining a strategy “that we think can be successful, and then to pursue it and pursue it with confidence and resolution." At the same time, Gates suggested that the administration was not moving toward an open-ended, indefinite commitment to having a U.S. military presence in Afghanistan.
"I think that we are being very careful to look at this as we go along," Gates said. "We've put out metrics so that we can measure whether or not we're making progress. And if we're not making progress, then we're prepared to adjust our strategy, just as we're looking at whether adjustments are needed right now."
Filed under: 

Read more...

A World the 44th President of the United States Inherited

Saturday, August 1, 2009

The following article is the 'Opinion of the Editor' James

It is still almost unimaginable that a person, truly to be called his own, steps up into politics, lives his life with the beliefs he cherishes, and then lives a dream to help others live the dreams he wants to share with everyone. Could it be possible that someone of this stature could actually exist?
In almost a fairy-tale story, President Obama is admired by so many people, and in a sense admired by his foes. They know as well as most other people that President Obama is unlike any other President that this country has ever had, besides the color of his skin.
Some of my close friends despise him. Why? They say that he's tearing the country apart. In as little as 200 days since he has been elected President and to become the most powerful man on the face of the earth, President Obama gladly excepts praise and criticism alike for the job he is trying his best to do.
What else can you expect from him. Look at what he inherited when he became President. I don't know about how you may look at this, but what I can tell you knowing what he knew before he took office about the state of the country, and the job he would have turning around a country diving deep into a recession and thanks to a President Bush who obviously cared more for promoting the wars he created for his own people, President Obama is facing every problem that needs to be tended to in a short amount of time in a frantic pace, right here at home. He still has so much to do, and the critics say that he is doing too much in a short period of time. What would you rather he do? Sit in the White House, read a myriad of books every week like our past president, and promote abusive interrogation techniques as President Bush has done since 911?
Other people ask why are we $11 trillion in debt? Other critics say that it is Obama's fault. They say that he has been in office less than 200 days and look what he has done to our children s future. Prior Presidents Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. both were very conservative presidents, and they should be credited as 'do nothing' presidents. If the 'Bush clan' would have acted in office and woke Congress up to work on a few programs that the country actually needed and spent a little money here at home, instead of creating a national debt that took a free fall because of the economy  and the wars while they were in office, then President Obama wouldn't be spending all this money to try and save the country from a continued disastrous state.
What do you think would have happened if he didn't bail out the banks? Would they had survived? I think not. What do you think would have happened if he didn't bail out the auto industry? They could no longer survive on their own. So the President lends money to the auto industry and in return, expects the automakers to do what it takes to become profitable again so that the money could be repaid.
Even with all the facts in place, with the failing banks, with the failing auto industry, with the massive layoffs of hundreds of thousands of people each month, the conservatives in this country still believe that this country could have survived on its own. How ignorant is that?
Talk about heartless. These conservatives think it is OK for thousands and thousands of people each month to loose their jobs, loose their homes, loose their savings. The motto for the Republicans is to 'let the strongest survive'. What about all of the people who need help.
You rarely hear on talk radio, the promotion of the Democratic party. What you do hear is the anti-government, radical talk show hosts like Limbaugh or Levin.
Levin especially drives me crazy when I hear his ranting every day on a local talk show station here in Dallas, Texas. Enough is enough. This blog will highlight specific shows of Levin and Limbaugh, and demonstrate to the readers of this blog how anti-US they actually are. You can listen to all the whining and lies from the duo right here on Obama in the White House blog.
The whiners that complain about Obama can only sit back and watch a President carry out policies that he truly believes in, someone who still has a minimum of 3+ years as President, and most likely will serve a second term as President of the United States, starting in 2012.
You may ask why I feel he will be already re-elected? Most likely because now there are already signs that the economy is turning around, and that unlike any other past Presidents including President Clinton, he WILL get a Heath Care Reform bill passed before the end of 2009. Even I feel a little skeptical regarding a change in health care policies as I have my reservations concerning specific issues within President Obama's health care proposal, but I sincerely believe that health care reform will happen before the end of the year, and then what. Most likely President Obama will be assured to gain a second term in office, especially if the economy keeps turning around as it is noticeably now.
How can you tell if the economy is turning around? Yes, the jobless numbers are still climbing, but there are people out there now with jobs that would have never acquired one without the economic stimulus package in place. Yes it is true that some of those jobs are just temporary, and that the monies that fund them will not be around a year from now. But what the money is for is to help people try and help themselves. In a year from now, many of these people will be able to hold jobs on their own, with the experience they have gained through these tough times. President Obama has stated that he will not feel successful with his recovery plan unless ALL people are back to work.
Why do you think that the conservative party is so up in arms against Obama's plans? They are trying to convince the radio audiences around the country that Obama is killing the country with his policies. All they are doing is spreading innuendos and lies, and make up stories. What they don't want you to know is that they want Obama to fail. Rush Limbaugh was one of the ONLY talk show hosts that said that statement publicly.
Now I'll let you in on a little secret? What if President Obama succeeds, and all the money is paid back to the government? What if the economy turns around? What if the stock markets come back? What if people start working again? What if Osama bin Laden is caught?  What if home sales start skyrocketing again? What if all the soldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq come home and the wars are over? What if the United States becomes friends with countries that President Bush wouldn't even talk to? What if all the prisons like Guantanamo Bay get closed, and terrorism drops dramatically with a Democratic President in Office?   There is one answer that satisfies all the questions. The answer is that the Republican party will be no more. The country will re-unite, and this time people will now work together with a common goal instead of constantly polarizing their thoughts or ideas and get nothing done.
President Obama was destined for the job. He came about in a time that the world needed him. The country believed that the time was now to have such a person to tend to the problems this country was now facing.
Regardless of what the Obama opposition says, the democratic party will continue to live on.

Read more...

Obama: Anti-terror plans focus on Pakistan, Afghanistan

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- More troops, new legislation, improved troop training and added civilian expertise highlight President Obama's strategy to fight terrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

President Obama, here with Hillary Clinton on Friday, calls the situation in Afghanistan "increasingly perilous."
Obama on Friday announced his plan to tackle what he called an "international security challenge of the highest order."
Stressing soberly that "the safety of people around the world is at stake," Obama said the "situation is increasingly perilous" in the region in and around Afghanistan, where the United States has been fighting al Qaeda and the Taliban for more than 7½ years after attacks in New York and at the Pentagon.
"The United States of America did not choose to fight a war in Afghanistan. Nearly 3,000 of our people were killed on September 11, 2001, for doing nothing more than going about their daily lives," said Obama, who has vowed to make Afghanistan the central front in the fight against terrorism.
"So let me be clear: Al Qaeda and its allies -- the terrorists who planned and supported the 9/11 attacks -- are in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Multiple intelligence estimates have warned that al Qaeda is actively planning attacks on the U.S. homeland from its safe haven in Pakistan.
Video Watch how the U.S. will target terrorist safe havens »
"And if the Afghan government falls to the Taliban -- or allows al Qaeda to go unchallenged -- that country will again be a base for terrorists who want to kill as many of our people as they possibly can."
Obama said it is key Americans understand that Pakistan "needs our help" against al Qaeda.
"Al Qaeda and other violent extremists have killed several thousand Pakistanis since 9/11. They have killed many Pakistani soldiers and police. They assassinated [former Pakistani Prime Minister] Benazir Bhutto. They have blown up buildings, derailed foreign investment and threatened the stability of the state. Make no mistake: Al Qaeda and its extremist allies are a cancer that risks killing Pakistan from within."
Video Watch Obama's speech on Afghanistan, Pakistan threats »
Flanked by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Obama called on Congress to pass a bipartisan bill co-sponsored by Sens. John Kerry, D-Massachusetts, and Richard Lugar, R-Indiana.
The legislation authorizes "$1.5 billion in direct support to the Pakistani people every year over the next five years -- resources that will build schools, roads and hospitals and strengthen Pakistan's democracy," he said.
He also urged Congress to pass legislation that would create opportunity zones in the border region. The goal is to develop the economy and bring hope to places plagued by violence. Obama said, "We will ask our friends and allies to do their part," including at a donors conference next month in Tokyo, Japan.
"After years of mixed results, we will not provide a blank check. Pakistan must demonstrate its commitment to rooting out al Qaeda and the violent extremists within its borders. And we will insist that action be taken -- one way or another -- when we have intelligence about high-level terrorist targets. "
Obama said the United States must work with the World Bank and International Monetary Fund and others to help Pakistan get through the economic crisis.
"To lessen tensions between two nuclear-armed nations that too often teeter on the edge of escalation and confrontation, we must pursue constructive diplomacy with both India and Pakistan."
Afghan President Harmid Karzai watched the speech on CNN from Kabul, said Richard Holbrooke, Obama's special envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Karzai "is extremely grateful and will issue his statement of support," Holbrooke said.
Obama stressed that "Afghanistan has been denied the resources that it demands because of the war in Iraq" and now a commitment must be made.
Obama said he is sending another 4,000 troops to Afghanistan, along with hundreds of civilian specialists, such as agricultural experts, educators and engineers. The troops -- which are in addition to the 17,000 announced earlier -- will be charged with training and building the Afghan army and police force.
The stakes are high as al Qaeda and the Taliban have escalated the insurgency and the number of U.S. troops deaths spiked last year -- the highest yearly death toll for them in the war.
Obama said the soldiers and Marines "will take the fight to the Taliban in the south and east" and will work with Afghan troops along the border. He said such an effort will bolster "security in advance of the important presidential election in August."
Video Watch Obama tell terrorists U.S. will defeat them »
Obama said the coalition "will accelerate" efforts to "build an Afghan army of 134,000 and a police force of 82,000 so that we can meet these goals by 2011 -- and increases in Afghan forces may very well be needed as our plans to turn over security responsibility to the Afghans go forward."
He said Afghanistan's government has been "undermined by corruption and has difficulty delivering basic services to its people" and its economy is undercut by "a booming narcotics trade that encourages criminality and funds the insurgency."
Video Watch Obama's remarks on the Afghan situation »
Obama said the United States will set clear benchmarks for international assistance and won't ignore attention to corruption.
He said the United States will develop a new contact group for Afghanistan and Pakistan that would include not only NATO allies and other partners but also Central Asian states, Gulf nations and Iran, Russia, India and China.
Reacting to Obama's plan, Sen. Russell Feingold, D-Wisconsin, said he is pleased the president is focusing on al Qaeda and is addressing the role of Pakistan but expressed concern the strategy could remain "overly Afghan-centric."
Citing Friday's suicide attack on a mosque in the Pakistani tribal region near Afghanistan, Feingold said, "This new administration must ensure that we do what we must not only in Afghanistan but also in Pakistan."
He said, "As the bombing near the Khyber Pass this morning highlights, we need to fully address the inextricable links between the crisis in Afghanistan and the instability and terrorist threats in Pakistan."
The bombing killed at least 48 people and wounded 80 to 90 others.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell praised Obama's plan, saying it is "a significant pivot" away from the Democratic Party's left wing.
"So the president's decision to continue Secretary Gates, follow [U.S. Central Command chief] Gen. [David] Petraeus' advice -- which may be somewhat exasperating to his own political left -- I think is in the best interest of the country and I think he's going to enjoy pretty strong Republican support for the plan," the Kentucky Republican told reporters.

Read more...

Obama: Anti-terror plans focus on Pakistan, Afghanistan

Saturday, March 28, 2009

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- More troops, new legislation, improved troop training and added civilian expertise highlight President Obama's strategy to fight terrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
President Obama, here with Hillary Clinton on Friday, calls the situation in Afghanistan "increasingly perilous."

President Obama, here with Hillary Clinton on Friday, calls the situation in Afghanistan "increasingly perilous."

Obama on Friday announced his plan to tackle what he called an "international security challenge of the highest order."

Stressing soberly that "the safety of people around the world is at stake," Obama said the "situation is increasingly perilous" in the region in and around Afghanistan, where the United States has been fighting al Qaeda and the Taliban for more than 7½ years after attacks in New York and at the Pentagon.

"The United States of America did not choose to fight a war in Afghanistan. Nearly 3,000 of our people were killed on September 11, 2001, for doing nothing more than going about their daily lives," said Obama, who has vowed to make Afghanistan the central front in the fight against terrorism.

"So let me be clear: Al Qaeda and its allies -- the terrorists who planned and supported the 9/11 attacks -- are in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Multiple intelligence estimates have warned that al Qaeda is actively planning attacks on the U.S. homeland from its safe haven in Pakistan. Video Watch how the U.S. will target terrorist safe havens »

"And if the Afghan government falls to the Taliban -- or allows al Qaeda to go unchallenged -- that country will again be a base for terrorists who want to kill as many of our people as they possibly can."

Obama said it is key Americans understand that Pakistan "needs our help" against al Qaeda.
Don't Miss

* Afghan soldier kills 2 coalition troops, U.S. says
* U.S. needs better intelligence in Afghanistan, director says
* Iran to send envoy to U.S.-backed Afghanistan summit
* NATO-led troops kill senior Afghan militant

"Al Qaeda and other violent extremists have killed several thousand Pakistanis since 9/11. They have killed many Pakistani soldiers and police. They assassinated [former Pakistani Prime Minister] Benazir Bhutto. They have blown up buildings, derailed foreign investment and threatened the stability of the state. Make no mistake: Al Qaeda and its extremist allies are a cancer that risks killing Pakistan from within." Video Watch Obama's speech on Afghanistan, Pakistan threats »

Flanked by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Obama called on Congress to pass a bipartisan bill co-sponsored by Sens. John Kerry, D-Massachusetts, and Richard Lugar, R-Indiana.

The legislation authorizes "$1.5 billion in direct support to the Pakistani people every year over the next five years -- resources that will build schools, roads and hospitals and strengthen Pakistan's democracy," he said.

He also urged Congress to pass legislation that would create opportunity zones in the border region. The goal is to develop the economy and bring hope to places plagued by violence. Obama said, "We will ask our friends and allies to do their part," including at a donors conference next month in Tokyo, Japan.

"After years of mixed results, we will not provide a blank check. Pakistan must demonstrate its commitment to rooting out al Qaeda and the violent extremists within its borders. And we will insist that action be taken -- one way or another -- when we have intelligence about high-level terrorist targets. "

Obama said the United States must work with the World Bank and International Monetary Fund and others to help Pakistan get through the economic crisis.

"To lessen tensions between two nuclear-armed nations that too often teeter on the edge of escalation and confrontation, we must pursue constructive diplomacy with both India and Pakistan."

Afghan President Harmid Karzai watched the speech on CNN from Kabul, said Richard Holbrooke, Obama's special envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Karzai "is extremely grateful and will issue his statement of support," Holbrooke said.

Obama stressed that "Afghanistan has been denied the resources that it demands because of the war in Iraq" and now a commitment must be made.

Obama said he is sending another 4,000 troops to Afghanistan, along with hundreds of civilian specialists, such as agricultural experts, educators and engineers. The troops -- which are in addition to the 17,000 announced earlier -- will be charged with training and building the Afghan army and police force.

The stakes are high as al Qaeda and the Taliban have escalated the insurgency and the number of U.S. troops deaths spiked last year -- the highest yearly death toll for them in the war.

Obama said the soldiers and Marines "will take the fight to the Taliban in the south and east" and will work with Afghan troops along the border. He said such an effort will bolster "security in advance of the important presidential election in August." Video Watch Obama tell terrorists U.S. will defeat them »

Obama said the coalition "will accelerate" efforts to "build an Afghan army of 134,000 and a police force of 82,000 so that we can meet these goals by 2011 -- and increases in Afghan forces may very well be needed as our plans to turn over security responsibility to the Afghans go forward."

He said Afghanistan's government has been "undermined by corruption and has difficulty delivering basic services to its people" and its economy is undercut by "a booming narcotics trade that encourages criminality and funds the insurgency." Video Watch Obama's remarks on the Afghan situation »

Obama said the United States will set clear benchmarks for international assistance and won't ignore attention to corruption.

He said the United States will develop a new contact group for Afghanistan and Pakistan that would include not only NATO allies and other partners but also Central Asian states, Gulf nations and Iran, Russia, India and China.

Reacting to Obama's plan, Sen. Russell Feingold, D-Wisconsin, said he is pleased the president is focusing on al Qaeda and is addressing the role of Pakistan but expressed concern the strategy could remain "overly Afghan-centric."

Citing Friday's suicide attack on a mosque in the Pakistani tribal region near Afghanistan, Feingold said, "This new administration must ensure that we do what we must not only in Afghanistan but also in Pakistan."

He said, "As the bombing near the Khyber Pass this morning highlights, we need to fully address the inextricable links between the crisis in Afghanistan and the instability and terrorist threats in Pakistan."

The bombing killed at least 48 people and wounded 80 to 90 others.
advertisement

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell praised Obama's plan, saying it is "a significant pivot" away from the Democratic Party's left wing.

"So the president's decision to continue Secretary Gates, follow [U.S. Central Command chief] Gen. [David] Petraeus' advice -- which may be somewhat exasperating to his own political left -- I think is in the best interest of the country and I think he's going to enjoy pretty strong Republican support for the plan," the Kentucky Republican told reporters.
E-mail to a friend E-mail to a friend
Share this on:
Mixx Digg Facebook del.icio.us reddit StumbleUpon MySpace
| Mixx it | Share

Read more...

Obama to send Troops to Afghanistan and Pakistan - to be Announced this Week

Thursday, March 26, 2009

In a CNN report, Obama is now expected to announce new strategies for Afghanistan and Pakistan on Friday. The plan will be for additional troops to Afghanistan along with civilian specialists, which will target what he considers "the central challenge facing (that) country."
Besides sending troops to Afghanistan, he will ask Congress to provide at least triple aid to Pakistan, during a five year period. He announced sending 4,000 more troops, adding this amount to 17,000 President Obama wants to send to Afghanistan. The main goal would be to train and build the Afghan army along with their police force. Eventual plans to increase the army's ranks to 135,000 and the police force to 80,000 by the year 2011.
President Obama is shifting the troops because he has intelligence that al Qaeda has moved their leadership from Kandahar, Afghanistan to somewhere in Pakistan. This is where he feels that al Qaeda is plotting against the U.S.
The only thing not really setup in the plan is an exit strategy. Until President Obama would know how and when his success will go forward in those occupied countries, that would determine when the troops may come home.
Durin the next week, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton plans to visit the Hague in the U.S. backed international conference on Afghanistan.

Read more...

International Hot Spots Inherited from Bush

Wednesday, February 4, 2009

In a world full of international hot spots, Barack Obama's administration must face a vast set of international crises and policy issues, which include the following:

Afghanistan - More than seven years into the war in Afghanistan, an increase in violence fueled by a resurgent Taliban has renewed focus on the conflict. The number of international troops killed in Afghanistan increased in 2008, when compared with previous years. In December, the U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan said that in 2007, there were 1,000 improvised explosive device blasts, and in 2008, there were 2,000 - numbers that illustrate the uptick in fighting. The current debate centers on whether increasing the number of U.S> and coalition troops -- similar to the "surge" strategy employed in Iraq during 2008 -- would help foster stability in Afghanistan. Meanwhile, al Qaeda, which used the country as a base for launching the September 11 terrorist attacks, has reportedly taken refuge in tribal areas along the border between Afghanistan and northwestern Pakistan, As of January 14, at least 1,048 U.S. and coalition troops had been killed in Afghanistan, according to a CNN count.

China - An emerging economic and military superpower, China will receive a great deal of attention from the Obama administration. First, the U.S. and Chinese economies are intimately intertwined through trade, the financial markets, and the ebb and flow of currency. Additionally, China, which holds veto power as a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, plays a pivotal role in international relations, especially during multilateral negotiations involving countries such as Iran. The Chinese are also regional power brokers, wielding substantial influence over policy toward countries like North Korea. Finally, there is the always-throny issue of human rights in China, which again caught the world's attention in 2008 when anti-Chinese demonstrations flared in Tibet.

Columbia - The United States has been providing aid to Colombia for the past three decades in an effort to curb drug trafficking that originates from the South American nation. Colombia is one of the world's major sources of cocaine and heroin, according to the U.S. Government Accountability Office. The U.S. state Department and U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration estimate that more than 90 percent of the cocaine brought into the U.S. comes from Colombia. The country also has to contend with paramilitary and narco-terrorist groups like the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) and the National Liberation Army (ELN), which are jousting for political power. Waves of violence, including assassinations, murders and kidnappings, tied to the drug trade and the paramilitary groups have rolled Colombia for much of its recent history. The United States has given more than 6 billion in aid to Colombia since 2000, according to a GAO report released in October 2008.

The Congo - The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), formerly Zaire, has been torn by war since the mid -1990's. The conflict has involved many of the country's neighbors and has killed an estimated 4 million people, according to World Vision, an aid group. The Rwandan genocide in 1994 weakened the government of Mobulu Sese Seko and allowed rebel groups, led by Laurent Kabila, to claim power three years later. In 1998, dissatisfaction with Kabila began a second conflict, and this time, six countries - the DRC, Rwanda, Uganda, Angola, Namibia and Zimbabwe -- joined the fighting. Kabila was assassinated in January 2001, and his son, Joseph, took over. The conflict came to an end five years later, and by June 2003, a new accord was in place. However fighting persisted in parts of the Congo for years afterward, especially in eastern Congo. Proxy armies set up by Uganda and Rwanda remained in the area and continued to arm militia groups, which fought among themselves and preyed on the civilian population. Hostilities flared again in october 2008, after Congolese rebels led by Laurent Nkunda, a renegade Tutsi general, renewed fighting in the eastern province of North Kivu.

Cuba - Fidel Castro, who ruled Cuba for decades, stepped down in February 2008 and ceded power to his brother, Raul. The chance in rule has spurred debate within the United States about its long-standing embargo on the island nation, which is 90 miles south of Florida. The U.S. and Cuba have no formal diplomatic relations. During the past few years, the Bush administration has tightened the U.S. embargo, increased Radio Marti news broadcasts into Cuba, curtailed visits home by Cuban-Americans and limited the amount of money Cuban-Americans can send to relatives. However, during the 2008 presidential campaign, Barack Obama called for loosening restrictions on travel to Cuba, so Cuban-Americans can visit relatives, as well as allowing larger money transfers to the island. "The road to freedom for all Cubans must begin with justice for Cuba's political prisoners, the right of free speech, a free press, freedom of assembly, and it must lead to elections that are free and fair," Obama said during a campaign rally in May 2008. Darfur, Sudan - Darfur, in western Sudan, is considered by many observers as the scene of this century's first genocide and is certainly the site of one of the world's worst humanitarian crises. The violence began in 2003, when rebels attacked government targets in Darfur, saying black Africans were being marginalized in the impoverished territory in favor of ethnic Arab groups. The Arab-led government retaliated, using government forces and government-armed Arab militia members known as the Janjaweed. An estimated 300,000 people have been killed during the past five years, and millions of others have been displaced to refugee camps, according to the United Nations. The U.N. and aid groups blame the Janjaweed for some of the worst atrocities, including rape, burning villages and poisoning wells. The Sudanese government denies genocide is occurring in Darfur and disputes the United Nations'
numbers. It says only 10,000 people have died in the fighting.

Iran - Relations between the United States and Iran have historically been chilly and have been further strained in recent years over Iran's nuclear program, which began during the mid-1970's and, earlier this decade, became controversial. Inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) from August 2003 through November 2004 found traces of highly enriched uranium. Iran maintains that it is enriching uranium for peaceful purposes and as part of a burgeoning nuclear energy program. The United States, which suspects Iran is secretly building a nuclear weapons program, has called on Tehran to halt the enrichment program. In February 2006, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad ordered Iran to end its cooperation with the IAEA. The United Nations later imposed sanctions on Iran over its nuclear program. During the presidential campaign, Obama said that he thought that a nuclear-armed Iran would be "unacceptable" and that he would help mount an international effort to prevent the country from acuiring nuclear weapons.

Iraq
- After more than five years of war, the Obama administration will have to manage the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq. During the presidential campaign, Obama said he would remove U.S. troops from Iraq within 16 months of taking office. His plan called for a "residual force" to remain in Iraq to fight terrorists and protect American personnel. Obama's campaign proposal will have to square with some top generals' preference for a gradual withdrawal. Whatever the eventual time line, under a new Status of Forces Agreement between Iraq and the U.S., all American troops will leave the country before Obama finishes his first term. The two nations agreed in December that American troops would withdraw from all Iraqi cities and towns by June 30, 2009. And, unless the agreement is renegotiated, all American troops will leave the country by the end of 2011. Until that date, American troops will continue to fight alongside Iraqis, but the Iraqis will take the lead, according to U.S. officials. As of January 14, at least 4,541 U.S. and coalition troops had been killed in Iraq since the war began in March 2003, according to
a CNN count.

North Korea - The U.S. has been at odds with the North Korean regime since the 1990's over its ambitions for a nuclear program. In 1994, North Korea pledged to freeze and eventually dismantle its nuclear weapons program in exchange for international aid to build tow power-producing nuclear reactors. Eight years later, North Korea, when confronted by the U.S. with proof that it was operating a uranium enrichment facility, admitted it had violated the
1994 agreement. In October 2006, North Korea said it successfully tested a nuclear weapon. However, a series of talks during 2007 resulted in North Korea agreeing to begin disabling its nuclear facilities for a $400 million aid package. In October 2008, the U.S. removed North Korea from its list of state sponsors of terrorism. nother round of talks began in December 2008 to track if North Korea was in compliance with the 2007 agreement.

Pakistan - Pakistan is n important US. foreign policy challenge for several reasons. Its proximity to Afghanistan and the role it has played in its internal politics during the past few decades give Pakistan great leverage over what happens in Afghanistans future. It is home to jihadist groups that are vying for more power domestically, seeking an Islamic state in Kashmir and trying to destabilize the region. Pakistan has nuclear weapons and has fought several wars during the past 60 years with India which also has nuclear weapons. Finally, some observers say Pakistan is on the verge of an economic crisis that could render it a failed state. In early December, Obama called the instability and increase in extremism in the region the "single most important threat"facing the United States. During the past two years, militants have assassinated Benazir Bhutto, a former prime minister who was once again campaigning for the post. And terrorists who killed 165 people in Mumbai, India, in late 2008 were trained in Pakistan and had links to Jihadist groups there, according to Indian and U.S. intelligence officials.

Russia - Though Russia, like almost every other country, is suffering from the ongoing international economic crisis and a drop in energy prices, it has gained considerable geopolitical power during the past few years as a result of its vast oil and natural gas resources. Russia is a member of the "uartet" - which also includes the United States. United Nations and the European Union - involved in brokering the Middle East peace process. It has also participated in talks with Iran and North Korea over their nuclear programs. The U.S. and Russia disagree on several fronts. The Russians have bristled at a U.S. anti-missle program that would put radar and missiles in the Czech Republic and Poland. The two nations were on opposite sides of the 2008 conflict between Russia and Georgia over the breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. The Russian government has also expressed concern that its former states, like Ukraine and Georgia, are hoping to join the 26-nation NATO defense alliance.

Venezuela
- Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, since his election in 1998, has adopted anti-American positions in regional politics. During a speech to the United Nations General Assembly in September 2006, in referring to President Bush, Chavez said, "The devil came here yesterday, and it smells of sulfur still today." During his presidential tenure, Chavez has nationalized the oil industry in Venezuela, and the profits from the energy boom earlier this decade have helped advance is positions. During the past few years, Chavez has either forged or
attempted to creae ties with nations that have adversarial relations with the U.S., including Cuba, Iran, Syria and North Korea, according to the US. State Department. The United States and Venezuela expelled each other's ambassadors in September 2008. A complicating factor for Obama's policymakers in regards to Venezuela is that the South American nation supplies 15 percent of U.S. crude oil imports.

Zimbabwe - The rule of Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe has been characterized by economic and political turmoil. The African nation has the highest inflation rate in the world - a staggering 231 million percent - and faces shortages of fuel, electricity and medical drugs. The Zimbabwean central bank recently introduced a $50 billion note worth less than $20 in U.S. currency. The World Health Organization says that a cholera outbreak has killed more than 1,500 people since Auust 2008 and that nearly 30,000 cases have been reported. (The numbers are current as of December 29, 2008.) The United Nations said 5 million people need food aid. President Robert Mugabe blames the crises on sanctions imposed by the West on grounds that he is disregarding human rights. But Mubabe's critics attribute the crisis to his economic policies. On the political front, a power-sharing deal between Mugabe and his rival, Morgan Tsvangirai, signed in September 2008, is in tatters. Tsvangirai says the Mugabe regime has led a campaign of kidnappings and violence intended to intimidate his supporters.

Global Terrorism - Since the attacks of September 11, 2001, terrorists have not struck inside the U.S, but the threat of international terrorism is very much alive. l Qaeda's leadership is reportedly holed up in tribal areas along the border between Afghanistan and northwestern Pakistan. Though their capacity to plan an attack along the scale of 9/11 has been the subject of recent debate, their methods have been adopted by militant groups around the world. Recently, terrorists killed 165 people and wounded hundreds in Mumbai, India. Earlier this decade, terrorists struck many countries across the globe, including Spain, England and Indonesia. In 2006, a plan to bomb American and Canadian passenger aircraft departing from London was thwarted. A purported message from Ayman al-Zawhiri, al Qaeda's No 2 leader, criticized Obama's positions on Iraq and Afghanistan and mocked his worldview. "A heavy legacy of failure and crimes awaits you," he said on the Web posting. The message appeared November 19, 2008.

Mideast Peace Process
- A final, comprehensive Israeli-Palestinian peace accord -- one that resolves issues over borders, refugees and the role of Jerusalem -- has been an elusive goal for U.S. presidents, and Obama is likely to find it just as difficult to achieve. At a w07 summit in Annapolis, Maryland, the two sides set the end of 2008 as a goal for completing a peace treaty. The year passed without a deal, and any prospects in the near future seem in jeopardy after the Israeli incursion into Gaza that began in late December 2008. Meanwhile, domestic politics in both camps also complicate the process. On the Palestinian side, Fatah, a moderate group, controls the West Bank, while Hamas, a more militant group, presides over Gaza. And in Israel, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert resigned in September 2008 amid allegations of corruption, with elections expected in February 2009.

Read more...

  © Free Blogger Templates Columnus by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP